CCSU Logo: Reading and Language Arts Department
 
RDG 698 - Reading Research

Fall 2006

Dr. Elene S. Demos

 

 

GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PRESENTATION

VIEW DOCUMENT

 

COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

Course Description

RDG 698 Research Seminar. Prereq.: 24 credits of graduate study in reading, and admission to 6th year or OCP program in reading and language arts. In-depth individual study of research pertaining to reading materials, programs, and methods. Research reports required.

This course is designed as a culminating experience for students in the Department of Reading and Language Arts. Each student will conduct a quantitative research project related to reading and language arts during the course of the semester. Though there is a limited number of formal class sessions scheduled for this course, the class requires many hours of outside reading, consultation with the professor and presentation to an audience of professionals. The research project should be of such quality that it can be submitted to a professional journal.

 

My office is located in Henry Barnard 244. For appointment call 860 832-2183 (office) or 860 826-8600 (home phone) or e-mail demos@ccsu.edu please identify yourself with RDG 698 in the subject line.

 

Required Textbooks

Pyrczak, F. and Bruce, R.R. (2003). Writing Empirical Research Reports, Fourth Edition.

American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th Edition.) Washington,D.C. Author

Creswell, John W. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second Edition), (2003) Sage Publications.

Jones, Paul W. and Kottler, Jeffrey, A.. Understanding Research: Becoming a Competent and Critical Consumer, 2006. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

 

Course Requirements

The course has four requirements:

  • Submission of a proposal,

  • Completion of a research project and a

  • Presentation to the class coupled with a presentation of results at the school/district level

  • Submission of course portfolio

 

Proposal

A written proposal must be submitted and approved prior to beginning the research. The proposal should mirror the sections of the Research Project, beginning with the:

  • Introduction,

  • Literature Review

  • Statement of Hypotheses

  • Methodology

  • Results and

  • Discussion

  •  

    Research report

    A written research study will be completed during the semester. The report must be word processed, double spaced, use APA style and should include the following sections:

    • Introduction: Presents the problem area, establishes its importance, and indicates the author’s perspectives on the problem. Introductions may conclude with explicit statement of the research hypotheses, purposes or questions to be explored in the study

    • Literature Review: This section is presented in the form of an essay organized around a topic outline that takes the reader from topic to topic, not in the form of an annotated list.

    • Statement of hypotheses: Describes the results that a researcher expects to find or presents a research purpose or question.

    • Methodology: A description of the physical steps taken to gather data; includes description of participants, materials, instrumentation, measuring tools and other procedures.

    • Results: Organized around the research hypotheses, purposes, or questions stated in the introduction; statistical reports; may include charts, tables, etc., or major trends and themes that emerged from analysis of data.

    • Discussion and Implications: Begin with a summary of the highlights of the study; in the discussion refer to the research hypotheses, purposes, or questions stated in the introduction; consider interpreting the results and offering explanations for them; explicitly state the implications of the results, and recommendations for future research.

    • Bibliography : A complete bibliography must be attached using APA style as identified in your current text. A minimum of ten citations must be used, with at least five after 1997.

     

    Presentation

    A presentation of research findings is required. This presentation will occur at a reading seminar hosted by the Department of Reading and Language Arts on Saturday December3rd, 2005.

     

    Course Portfolio

    Each student is expected to complete a course portfolio by December 8, 2005.

     

    Research Study Evaluation

    A number of rubrics have been developed for the course. Each rubric deals with a specific section of the research study. A rubric has also been developed for the proposal and an overall rubric is provided for the entire project. These rubrics include:

     

    Course Objectives, Standards, and Conceptual Framework.

    The matrix below identifies the course objectives, the International Reading Association Standards and the School of Education and Professional Studies Conceptual Framework.

     

    COURSE OBJECTIVES

    IRA STANDARDS

    and SUBCATEGORIES

    ADDRESSED

    SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

    Review and summarize research in reading and language arts through a review of and articulate how these studies impact on the research study that is being proposed.

    Standard 1.

    Foundational Knowledge

     

    Subcategory 1.2:

    Demonstrate knowledge of reading research and histories of reading.

    Conceptual Framework I.

    The Education Professional as Active Learner

    A. Possesses strong content knowledge in the arts and sciences

    D. Engages in habits of critical thinking and problem solving

     

    Conceptual Framework III.

    The Education Professional as Reflective and Collaborative Practitioner

    C. Engages in opportunities for professional growth

     

    Identify and critique research/theories in the areas of language, literacy, and culture K-12.

    Standard 1.

    Foundational Knowledge

     

    Subcategory 1.1:

    Demonstrate knowledge of psychological, sociological, and linguistic foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.

     

    Subcategory 1.3:

    Demonstrate knowledge of language development and reading acquisition and the variations related to cultural and linguistic diversity.

    Conceptual Framework I.

    The Education Professional as Active Learner

    A. Possesses strong content knowledge in the arts and sciences

    D. Engages in habits of critical thinking and problem solving

     

    Conceptual Framework III.

    The Education Professional as Reflective and Collaborative Practitioner

    C. Engages in opportunities for professional growth

     

    Develop a quantitative researh poject. Collect, analyze, and use data to inform one's own literacy curriculum and instruction, and to communicate assessment information to various audiences

    Standard 3.

    Assessment, Diagnosis, and Evaluation

     

    Subcategory 3.3:

    Use assessment information to plan, evaluate, and revise effective instruction that meets the needs of all students, including those at different developmental stages and those from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds.

     

    Subcategory 3.4:

    Communicate results of assessments to specific individuals (students, parents, caregivers, colleagues, administrators, policymakers, policy officials, community, etc.).

    Conceptual Framework II.

    The Education Professional as Facilitator of Learning for All Students

    B. Communicates in multiple forms to diverse audiences

    D. Understands the learning process and applies instructional and assessment strategies and technologies to facilitate learning

     

    Conceptual Framework III.

    The Education Professional as Reflective and Collaborative Practitioner

    B. Accepts responsibility for student learning

    C. Engages in opportunities for professional growth

     

    Interpret research findings related to the study and communicate these to colleagues and the wider community.

    Standard 5.

    Professional Development

     

    Subcategory 5.1:

    Display positive dispositions related to reading and the teaching of reading.

    Conceptual Framework I.

    The Education Professional as Active Learner

    B. Communicates in multiple forms to diverse audiences

    D. Engages in habits of critical thinking and problem solving

     

    Conceptual Framework III.

    The Education Professional as Reflective and Collaborative Practitioner

    B. Accepts responsibility for student learning

    C. Engages in opportunities for professional growth

     

    Advance the professional research base to expand knowledge-based practices.

    Standard 5.

    Professional Development

     

    Subcategory 5.2:

    Continue to pursue the development of professional knowledge and dispositions.

    Conceptual Framework I.

    The Education Professional as Active Learner

    A. Possesses strong content knowledge in the arts and sciences

    D. Engages in habits of critical thinking and problem solving

     

    Conceptual Framework III.

    The Education Professional as Reflective and Collaborative Practitioner

    C. Engages in opportunities for professional growth

     

     

    Additional Notes

    All research projects must be approved by the CCSU human subjects review board for approval, prior to being granted final approval. Forms can be obtained on-line.

    Students will provide a periodic report on progress of research and submit two printed copies and one electronic of final research report no later than December 8, 2005.